10 Best Android Crash Reporting Tools in 2026

Looking for the best Android crash reporting tool? Explore the top 10 platforms of 2026 to detect, diagnose, and fix crashes faster for reliable mobile apps.

Delivering a seamless Android app experience is critical for user retention and brand success. With the wide range of devices, OS versions, and hardware variability, crashes and ANRs are unfortunately common. For engineering teams, quickly detecting, diagnosing, and resolving these issues is vital for higher app ratings, better retention, and stronger revenue.

There are many crash reporting solutions on the market, each with its own strengths. This article explores the 10 best Android crash reporting tools in 2026, highlighting where each stands out and what types of teams they’re best suited for.

Quick Comparison: Best Android Crash Reporting Tools

1. Embrace

Embrace captures 100% of user sessions, giving engineering teams complete visibility into Android crashes, ANRs, and performance issues. Instead of just isolated error logs, Embrace shows the full user journey, including network calls, device state, and user actions.

Best for: Mobile engineering teams that want full context around crashes and performance issues.

Features:

• Full-session timelines with crash, ANR, and performance events
• Network performance monitoring and troubleshooting
• Custom metrics and smart alerts with OpenTelemetry support

Pros:

• End-to-end mobile visibility with complete session capture
• Combines crash and performance monitoring in one platform
• Mobile-first design tailored for Android apps

Cons:

• Paid solution (not free like Crashlytics)
• Data capture requires configuration for very large apps
• May offer more functionality than very small teams initially need

2. Firebase Crashlytics

Firebase Crashlytics is widely used because it’s free, easy to set up, and integrates with other Firebase services. It’s a common first step for smaller Android teams.

Best for: Startups or teams already invested in Firebase services.

Features:

• Real-time crash detection and alerts
• Lightweight SDK with minimal performance impact
• Integration with Firebase Performance Monitoring

Pros:

• Free to use, quick setup
• Part of the Firebase ecosystem
• Real-time crash alerts and stack traces

Cons:

• Limited visibility beyond stack traces
• No full session context
• Less suited for enterprise-scale needs

3. BugSnag

BugSnag offers flexible workflows and real-time error monitoring. Its customizable grouping and stability score make it popular with larger development teams.

Best for: Teams that want customizable workflows and stability metrics.

Features:

• Real-time error and crash monitoring
• Stability score for measuring release quality
• Flexible grouping and filtering options

Pros:

• Highly customizable error handling
• Useful stability scoring for release decisions
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines

Cons:

• Captures crash snapshots, not full user sessions
• Not Android-specific; broader platform focus
• Requires tuning to reduce noisy alerts

4. Sentry

Sentry provides developer-friendly error monitoring and release tracking. It’s strong across multiple platforms but less specialized for Android session visibility.

Best for: Developer teams that want broad error monitoring with Android support.

Features:

• Real-time error monitoring and regression alerts
• Release tracking and version comparison
• Session replay for visual debugging

Pros:

• Rich developer integrations
• Session replay helps visualize crashes
• Strong release tracking

Cons:

• Not mobile-first, covers many platforms
• Requires setup for deeper Android insights
• Session replay limited compared to full-session capture

5. Instabug

Instabug combines crash reporting with in-app user feedback, giving teams both technical and qualitative data for app health.

Best for: Product and support teams that want both crash data and user insights.

Features:

• In-app feedback and survey collection
• Crash reporting with contextual session replay
• Release monitoring and performance tracking

Pros:

• Useful for gathering user-reported issues
• Session replay aids crash reproduction
• Bridges product and engineering workflows

Cons:

• Feedback features can add overhead
• Less depth in technical crash analysis
• Scaling across multiple apps may be costly

6. Bugsee

Bugsee focuses on synchronized video replays, showing user actions and network events around a crash.

Best for: Teams needing visual debugging to reproduce hard-to-diagnose crashes.

Features:

• Video replay of crashes with logs and UI state
• Captures user interactions and network traffic
• Integrations with Jira, Slack, and Trello

Pros:

• Strong for reproducing complex crashes
• Combines visual and technical data
• Easy integration with developer tools

Cons:

• Narrower focus on visual debugging
• Can generate heavy data volumes
• Less scalable for enterprise observability

7. Raygun

Raygun combines crash reporting with real user monitoring (RUM), allowing teams to measure both error frequency and end-user impact.

Best for: Multi-platform teams that want crash-free session tracking.

Features:

• Real-time error reporting and crash analytics
• Crash-free user tracking and metrics
• AI-driven resolution suggestions

Pros:

• Helpful for measuring app stability over time
• Customizable dashboards and alerts
• Integrates with Jira, Slack, GitHub

Cons:

• Not Android-first; broad platform coverage
• Less contextual detail than full-session tools
• Costs scale with app size and usage

8. Countly

Countly offers crash analytics within its broader analytics platform, with strong support for privacy and compliance.

Best for: Enterprises with strict compliance and data sovereignty requirements.

Features:

• Crash reporting with cohort segmentation
• On-premises or private cloud deployment options
• Comprehensive SDK coverage for Android and beyond

Pros:

• Strong privacy and compliance controls
• Flexible deployment models
• Useful for enterprise-scale analytics

Cons:

• More analytics-focused than crash-focused
• Limited debugging capabilities
• Setup complexity for technical teams

9. UXCam

UXCam is a UX analytics tool that includes crash detection, linking failures to user behavior patterns.

Best for: Product and UX teams connecting crashes with engagement metrics.

Features:

• Session replay and heatmaps for user flows
• Automatic crash detection
• Funnel and retention analytics

Pros:

• Good for understanding user experience impact
• Visualizes how crashes affect retention
• Strong for product analytics

Cons:

• Limited technical crash resolution depth
• Not a dedicated crash reporting tool
• Data less actionable for developers

10. HeadSpin

HeadSpin provides large-scale device testing under real-world conditions, with AI-powered crash insights.

Best for: QA and testing teams running pre-release crash diagnostics.

Features:

• Real-device session recordings
• AI-powered root cause analysis
• No SDK or code integration required

Pros:

• Effective for testing across many devices
• Identifies performance regressions
• Works without modifying app code

Cons:

• Not built for continuous production monitoring
• Limited visibility into live user sessions
• Primarily a QA-focused tool

Conclusion

Each Android crash reporting tool brings different strengths. For some teams, free and lightweight options like Crashlytics may be sufficient. Others may prefer customizable platforms like BugSnag or feedback-focused tools like Instabug.

For teams that need complete visibility into Android crashes and ANRs, Embrace stands out. By capturing every session, network call, and crash event, it gives engineering teams the context they need to resolve issues quickly and deliver a reliable, high-performing mobile experience.

Author

Laura Bolos

Laura is the Head of Digital Marketing at Embrace. She brings over 12 years of experience working at startups building developer-focused products. She’s passionate about helping engineering teams evaluate and adopt observability tools that improve both developer and end-user experience.